Back to Articles

How long-term partnerships strengthen refinery maintenance and reliability

Article

$altText

Reliability improvements often come from dozens of small projects completed over many years. The challenge is making sure lessons learned from one project aren’t lost before the next one begins. At one U.S. refining company, S&B supports engineering and procurement for projects across multiple facilities. The work ranges from equipment upgrades to larger capital projects. Each site has its own equipment, specifications and operating history, but the teams often face similar questions: What has worked before? What caused problems? How will a change affect the people who operate and maintain the facility?

Those questions matter to owners balancing aging assets, turnaround schedules and competing capital needs. Decisions made on one project can have implications well beyond its immediate scope, from creating downstream maintenance challenges to affecting connected systems. Lessons from one facility can also help another avoid similar problems and make better-informed decisions.

A long-term partner can bring that knowledge into the next project. Over time, the team learns the owner's facilities, understands upcoming work and connects engineering decisions with construction and operating needs.

Why partnership continuity matters

A long-term engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) partner can help owners:

  • Identify maintenance and constructability risks earlier
  • Apply lessons from one project or site to another
  • Plan equipment purchases around upcoming work
  • Prepare more effectively for turnarounds
  • Match the project team and planning process to the size and risk of each job

The value grows when the partner can support a broad portfolio while giving smaller site projects the attention they need.

Small projects can have a large operating impact

Major capital projects demand substantial resources. Smaller projects can have a more immediate effect on the people who run a refinery each day. A team may need to change a pump impeller, replace a transformer or add a short line to address an operating issue.

Each job requires the right level of review. Changing a pump impeller, for example, may affect connected piping and safety systems. The team needs to understand those effects before it defines the scope and cost.

Owners also need a partner willing and able to take on that work. Some EPC firms focus on large projects. S&B can scale its support from a focused site assignment to a larger capital program, drawing on its engineering expertise, construction experience and teams near customer facilities as the work requires.

That scalability matters when an owner has many projects underway. A small reliability improvement should not wait simply because the partner's organization only fits large jobs.

Facility knowledge improves decisions

Engineers who work with a facility over time learn details that project files may not fully explain. Engineering records document what was changed, but they do not always capture why decisions were made, what alternatives were considered or what operating challenges influenced the outcome. Teams that retain that institutional knowledge can often identify risks, avoid repeating past mistakes and make more informed decisions as new projects develop.

They know which equipment has caused recurring trouble, why a site prefers certain components and what happened during previous modifications.

Consider a control valve that has created reliability problems. A team familiar with that history can raise the issue before another project specifies the same valve. It can also explain the reason for a different choice to newer employees.

That knowledge can extend across an owner's facilities. In S&B's refining partnership, the team can see upcoming work at multiple sites. If one site develops a better approach to a common task, engineers can discuss whether it would help elsewhere. They can also identify common equipment needs early enough to give procurement more time to address availability and delivery schedules.

Each site still needs a solution that fits its equipment and operating requirements. Portfolio knowledge gives the team a stronger starting point; it does not replace site-specific judgment.

Field input strengthens early planning

Construction teams can identify problems that may not appear obvious in engineering documents. They can assess equipment access, installation sequence and the time available for a tie-in during a turnaround.

That’s why S&B involves construction in kickoff meetings, site walks, tie-in walks and model reviews. The construction input helps engineers develop drawings and plans that account for field conditions. S&B can also bring construction management experience into early planning when another contractor will perform the work.

The coordination matters most when a project has a fixed outage window. Engineers need to deliver information in time for construction teams to prepare. Early discussions give the team a chance to resolve questions before crews arrive in the field.

Combined with long-term facility knowledge, that field perspective helps teams make practical decisions that account for both engineering requirements and day-to-day operating realities. The result is often fewer surprises during execution and better alignment between project objectives and maintenance needs.

The right partner fits the work

A long-term partnership works best when the owner and partner agree on what each project needs to accomplish. Cost and schedule remain important, but success may also depend on a turnaround date, a reliability target or the ease of maintaining new equipment after startup.

The experienced team can then choose an approach that fits the job. A complex change may need extensive planning and review. A straightforward replacement may call for a simpler process. Open conversations about risks and trade-offs help both sides make those choices.

For refinery owners, continuity connects individual projects to a broader maintenance and reliability strategy. In many organizations, one of the biggest challenges is preserving knowledge as personnel, priorities and projects change over time. A partner who understands the facilities, brings field experience into planning and scales its team to the work can help owners make better decisions across the full portfolio. 

Learn more about how S&B supports refinery maintenance, reliability and capital improvement projects. 

Back to Articles

Related Content

Alliance engineering: How continuity preserves mill knowledge

Article |

An S&B EPC constructor reviewing plans with a measuring tape at a capital project under construction

EPC vs. EPCM: What’s the Difference and Why It Matters

Article |

S&B logo and World Engineering Day text overlaid on an industrial plant with distillation towers

World Engineering Day: How Integrated Global Engineering Strengthens Project Delivery

Article |